Zephirus

Nerds/Otakus/Asiáticos e Tipos de Personalidade

69 mensagens neste tópico

Olá pessoal, eu hoje decidi vir aqui falar de um assunto polémico, quero desde já avisar que eu não estou a implicar nada, mas sim a falar da minha experiência pessoal.

Mas vamos por partes:

Eu sofro de uma coisa chamada, transtorno esquizóide de personalidade, eu podia explicar isto muito detalhadamente, mas vou me apenas referir ao básico, eu sou tipo um "autista social", quero dizer que, tal como um autista sou muito inteligente, sou individualista e tenho uma grande imaginação.

Também no outro dia fiz um Myers-Briggs, custou-me os olhos da cara mas descobri que sou um INTP.

Mas vamos explicar o que é um Myers Briggs. É um tipo de teste que se faz a uma pessoa para determinar o seu tipo de personalidade. São 8 letrinhas que indicam quatro pares de características entre Introversão/Extroversão, iNtuição/Sensação, Pensamento (T)/Sentimento (F), Juízo/Percepção

Por exemplo

Adolf Hitler (ENTJ)

David Kersey chama a indivíduos que são ENTJ de Fieldmarshals:

Eis a descrição da wikipedia:




Fieldmarshals are abstract, pragmatic, directive, and expressive. They tend to be highly skilled in situational organizing, directing their own actions and those of others. Their talent for contingency planning is a close second to their ability to coordinate, decide, and execute a strategy. Born engineers, they want to break an idea or concept into its most fundamental parts, subject those parts to intense scrutiny, and reassemble the idea before giving it their final approval. Their desire to ensure that an assessment is valid extends to their own work, and they will often seek the opinion of another trusted individual[...]

Fieldmarshals have a strong desire to give structure and direction to groups of people. Of all the role variants, Fieldmarshals are the most likely to see where an organization is headed, and they want to communicate that vision to others. Thus they are more directive in their social exchanges than they are informative. Fieldmarshals often rise to positions of responsibility in work because they tend to be devoted to their jobs and are excellent administrators. Fieldmarshals may not actively seek out leadership responsibilities, but will often volunteer themselves to take charge in situations where leadership is absent or has failed, or where a power vacuum suddenly exists—not because they are particularly interested in power as such, but due to their innate desire to see a given system (be it social, political, workplace, or otherwise) continue to function until a suitable leader can be identified, who, in the mind of the Fieldmarshal, is as good at leadership as at background administration.

Fieldmarshals search more for goals and policy than they do for procedures and regulations. They strive to make their organization more efficient by reducing red tape, task redundancy, and confusion in the workplace. Fieldmarshals take a straightforward and tough-minded attitude toward tasks, approaching them with impartial analysis, and basing their decisions on well thought-out plans, impersonal data, and overall probability of success. They expect others to follow their vision, and they are willing to remove stumbling blocks that prevent a given system (human or otherwise) from being fully productive. For Fieldmarshals, there must be a goal-directed reason for executing any plan. People’s emotions are generally considered secondary to raw data in any decision-making process.

Fieldmarshals are impatient with ineffectiveness, inefficiency, and the repetition of error. If an established procedure can be demonstrated to be ineffective at accomplishing a certain goal, they will abandon the procedure. Fieldmarshals keep long-term and short-term objectives in mind while striving to turn their organizations into smooth-functioning, empirically stable systems.




Digam-me se isto não descreve muito bem Hitler XD

Mas quanto ao meu tipo, como eu disse sou um INTP por isso sou um Architect

Leiam lá a descrição:



Architects are introspective, logical, rational, pragmatic, clear-headed, informative, and attentive. The scientific systemization of all knowledge, or Architectonics, is highly developed in Architects, who are intensely curious and see the world as something to be understood. Their primary interest is to determine how things are structured, built, or configured. Architects are designers of theoretical systems and new technologies. Rearranging the environment to fit their design is a distant goal of Architects.

Architects are logically and verbally precise. In casual conversations, they may be tempted to point out errors the other speaker makes, with the simple goal of maintaining clarity within the exchange. In serious discussions, Architects' abilities to detect distinctions, inconsistencies, contradictions, and frame arguments gives them an enormous advantage. In debates, Architects can be devastating, even to the point of alienation from the group with detailed logical arguments, which may be characterized as "hair-splitting" or "logic-chopping".

Architects tend to analyze the world in depth. They prefer to quietly work alone and they may shut other people out if they are focused on analysis. This, coupled with the fact that Architects are often quiet, makes it difficult for other individuals to get to know them. In social exchanges, Architects' interest in informing others about what they have learned is greater than their interest in directing the actions of others.

Credentials or other forms of traditional authority do not impress Architects. Instead, logically coherent statements are the only things that seem to persuade them. Architects value intelligence highly and are often impatient with people with less ability than they have. An architect often perceives himself as being one of the few individuals capable of defining the ends a society must achieve and will often strive to find the most efficient means to accomplish their ends. This perspective can make Architects seem arrogant to others.




Agora vão à pagina da wikipedia no inicio deste texto e leiam outra vez a descrição para o que eu tenho.

Por ultimo gostaria de acrescentar uma ultima leitura:



Because humans need both autonomy and interdependence, persons with either an extreme collectivist orientation (allocentrics) or extreme individualist values (idiocentrics) may be at risk for possession of some features of psychopathology. Caldwell-Harris & Aycicegi33 revealed that for students residing in a highly individualistic society (Boston), collectivism and individualism were not related to DSM-IV SPD1. A different pattern was obtained for students residing in a collectivist culture, Istanbul. Here individualism was positively correlated with scales of schizoid personality disorder. Gunsalus & Kelly34 found that Korean students scored significant higher on the schizoid personality scales35 compared with American students, and Iwamasa et al.36 revealed that criteria for DSM-III-R schizoid PD25 was assigned to Asian Americans. The author suggests that the increased risk for Asian Americans could be the result of belonging tot a collectivistic culture, while living in an individualistic society. The author speculates that social expectations in persons with individualistic attitude (when a collective attitude is required) might lead to social exclusion, loneliness and associated SPD. The higher SPD scores of Korean students could be explained by cultural determined personality traits such as introversion, modesty, and social withdrawal.


Source: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S0213-61632010000100005&script=sci_arttext



Eis a minha lógica, há quem considere o que eu tenho não uma doença mas um exagero de personalidade e bem eu já confirmei o tipo de personalidade que eu tenho. Reparem que a minha doença pelo motivos descritos tem uma grande incidência na população de origem asiática e que também por base mais o tipo de educação que um individuo tem e não o facto de ter nascido com ela ou assim. Então ouçam só o que eu estou a inferir, não foram os asiáticos que criaram uma boa parte da cultura nerd e a cultura otaku, mas sim o tipo de educação que tiveram levou-os a ter uma personalidade específica que levou a criação da cultura otaku. O tipo IN refere para inteligência introvertida, dado intuição neste tipo de teste é sinónimo de inteligência, isso explicaria porque há tão poucos  otakus/nerds na nossa sociedade, a forma como as pessoas são criadas não as remete para tentarem ser inteligentes ou minimamente cultas, já a cultura asiática remete para uma vida de estudo, daí a criação da proeminente cultura otaku, e como todos os verdadeiros otakus são inteligentes (atrevendo-me a dizer que são do tipo N para perceberem que anime não é só mais um tipo de bonecos) e a maior parte são introvertidos, percebe-se porque há tantos na Asia e tão poucos na Europa e isso explicaria um montão de coisas. Ou seja a sociedade moldou a minoria, não foi a minoria que moldou a sociedade.

Lamento pela seca toda mas alguém quer discutir isto?
 

BTW Se tiverem dúvidas eu esclareço.

4 membros gostaram disto!

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

tenho de fazer um teste desses :3

 

interessante não sabia da existência de tal coisa , curti

 

além do mais todos somos "loucos" como o bob diz kkk

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

Eu acho que isso é daquelas coisas que eles inventam hoje em dia para dizer que são doentes , tipo antes as criancas nao paravam quietas era mal comportadas hoje a criança não para quieta , é hiperactiva . Não segue a mesma logica esse tipo de coisa? Ou sou eu que entendi mal o assunto xD

1 membro gostou disto!

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

Um tema extremamente interessante. Eu fiz um teste de Myers-Briggs online aqui há uns tempos, e deu-me INTJ

 

Characteristics of INTJs[edit]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2012)
INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake ... INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait of combining imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority come into play. Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel ... This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals ... Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense.

—Marina Margaret Heiss[11]
INTJs are analytical. Like INTPs, they are most comfortable working alone and tend to be less sociable than other types. Nevertheless, INTJs are prepared to lead if no one else seems up to the task, or if they see a major weakness in the current leadership. They tend to be pragmatic, logical, and creative. They have a low tolerance for spin or rampant emotionalism. They are not generally susceptible to catchphrases and do not readily accept authority based on tradition, rank, or title.

INTJs are strong individualists who seek new angles or novel ways of looking at things. They enjoy coming to new understandings. They tend to be insightful and mentally quick; however, this mental quickness may not always be outwardly apparent to others since they keep a great deal to themselves. They are very determined people who trust their vision of the possibilities, regardless of what others think. They may even be considered the most independent of all of the sixteen personality types. INTJs are at their best in quietly and firmly developing their ideas, theories, and principles.

—Sandra Krebs Hirsch[12]
Hallmarks of the INTJ include independence of thought and a desire for efficiency. They work best when given autonomy and creative freedom. They harbor an innate desire to express themselves by conceptualizing their own intellectual designs. They have a talent for analyzing and formulating complex theories. INTJs are generally well-suited for occupations within academia, research, consulting, management, science, engineering, and law. They are often acutely aware of their own knowledge and abilities—as well as their limitations and what they don't know (a quality that tends to distinguish them from INTPs). INTJs thus develop a strong confidence in their ability and talents, making them natural leaders.

In forming relationships, INTJs tend to seek out others with similar character traits and ideologies. Agreement on theoretical concepts is an important aspect of their relationships. By nature INTJs can be demanding in their expectations, and approach relationships in a rational manner. As a result, INTJs may not always respond to a spontaneous infatuation but wait for a mate who better fits their set criteria. They tend to be stable, reliable, and dedicated. Harmony in relationships and home life tends to be extremely important to them. They generally withhold strong emotion and do not like to waste time with what they consider irrational social rituals. This may cause non-INTJs to perceive them as distant and reserved; nevertheless, INTJs are usually very loyal partners who are prepared to commit substantial energy and time into a relationship to make it work.

As mates, INTJs want harmony and order in the home and in relationships. The most independent of all types,[13] INTJs trust their intuition when choosing friends and mates—even in spite of contradictory evidence or pressure from others. The emotions of an INTJ are hard to read, and neither male nor female INTJs are apt to express emotional reactions. At times, INTJs seem cold, reserved, and unresponsive, while in fact they are almost hypersensitive to signals of rejection from those they care for. In social situations, INTJs may also be unresponsive and may neglect small rituals designed to put others at ease. For example, INTJs may communicate that idle dialogue such as small talk is a waste of time. This may create the impression that the INTJ is in a hurry—an impression that is not always intended. In their interpersonal relationships, INTJs are usually better in a working situation than in a recreational situation.

 

 

O INTJ é o equivalente ao Mastermind de Kersey

 

Masterminds are introspective, logical, rational, pragmatic, clear-headed, directive, and attentive. As strategists, they are better than any other type at brainstorming approaches to situations. Masterminds are capable but not eager leaders, stepping forward only when it becomes obvious to them that they are the best for the job. Strong-willed and very self-assured, they may make this decision quickly, as they tend to make all decisions. But though they are decisive, they are open to new evidence and new ideas, flexible in their planning to accommodate changing situations. They tend to excel at judging the usefulness of ideas and will apply whatever seems most efficient to them in accomplishing their clearly envisioned goals. To Masterminds, what matters is getting it done—but also learning the principles of how to get it done efficiently and well, that is, at a professional level of quality. However, they may not give much thought to the social cost of getting there, "focusing so tightly on their own pursuits [that] they can ignore the points of view and wishes of others."[1]:200

Masterminds are highly pragmatic, and they will put forth a great deal of time and effort to implement effective ideas. They are driven to solve complex problems and to create organized, decided, and executed solutions. Masterminds tend to make positive statements instead of negative ones, focusing on how to make the organization more efficient in the future rather than dwelling on past mistakes.

Masterminds are also highly theoretical, and one of the more open-minded of the 16 role variants. Before Masterminds adopt a theoretical notion, they insist on researching all the available data and checking the idea against reality. Masterminds are suspicious of theories based on poor research and will discard ideas that cannot be effectively implemented.

As leaders, Masterminds are skilled in contingency planning and entailment organizing, which are directive activities that tell the planner what activities to do and in what order to do them. Once in a position of power, Masterminds are known for their efficiency and willingness to adopt useful ideas.

 

 

Por acaso acho que me explica bastante bem, tirando um ou outro ponto, nomeadamente o grande gosto por não fazer um cú da vida :P

 

 

INTJs really want people to make sense.

Esta é uma das frases que melhor me identifica. O ser humano é um produto da natureza, da conjunção de todas as leis da física, mas ao mesmo tempo a sua psique, nas formas mais variadas, é um autêntico caos, não aparenta ter uma organização lógica das ideias e pensamentos, é como se o que as pessoas efectivamente gostam/aceitam/defendem fosse apenas um produto do acaso e não de um pensamento e/ou critérios logico-pragmáticos...

 

 

 

They work best when given autonomy and creative freedom. They harbor an innate desire to express themselves by conceptualizing their own intellectual designs. They have a talent for analyzing and formulating complex theories. INTJs are generally well-suited for occupations within academia, research, consulting, management, science, engineering, and law. They are often acutely aware of their own knowledge and abilities—as well as their limitations and what they don't know (a quality that tends to distinguish them from INTPs). INTJs thus develop a strong confidence in their ability and talents, making them natural leaders.

Este parágrafo dá um grande insight sobre a minha psique. Eu sou uma pessoa extremamente criativa, mas não naquele sentido que nós normalmente damos à criatividade. Se me pedirem para fazer um desenho ou compor uma música (músico amador here) esqueçam, é lixado para mim. No entanto, se me derem um problema para as mãos, e me deixarem resolve-lo como eu quiser, a minha criatividade é trazida ao de cima. Sou capaz de resolver problemas bastante complexos (nomeadamente de engenharia) com um misto de ingenuidade e de engenho, ao mesmo tempo que consigo criar uma solução abstracta, funcional e, acima de tudo, reliable (esqueci-me do termo em PT para isto ^^).

 

Sou uma pessoa que está bastante ciente do que sou capaz e incapaz de fazer, embora esteja a equilibrar a confiança nas minhas capacidades com a falta de confiança nelas neste momento (de um ponto de vista mais inconsciente) devido a sofrer de estado depressivo há uns tempos.

 

 

 

Quando tiver mais tempo depois escrevo mais uns bitaites :P

Editado por hikigaya_haru
2 membros gostaram disto!

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

Um tema extremamente interessante. Eu fiz um teste de Myers-Briggs online aqui há uns tempos, e deu-me INTJ

 

Characteristics of INTJs[edit]

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2012)

INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake ... INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait of combining imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority come into play. Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel ... This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals ... Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense.

—Marina Margaret Heiss[11]

INTJs are analytical. Like INTPs, they are most comfortable working alone and tend to be less sociable than other types. Nevertheless, INTJs are prepared to lead if no one else seems up to the task, or if they see a major weakness in the current leadership. They tend to be pragmatic, logical, and creative. They have a low tolerance for spin or rampant emotionalism. They are not generally susceptible to catchphrases and do not readily accept authority based on tradition, rank, or title.

INTJs are strong individualists who seek new angles or novel ways of looking at things. They enjoy coming to new understandings. They tend to be insightful and mentally quick; however, this mental quickness may not always be outwardly apparent to others since they keep a great deal to themselves. They are very determined people who trust their vision of the possibilities, regardless of what others think. They may even be considered the most independent of all of the sixteen personality types. INTJs are at their best in quietly and firmly developing their ideas, theories, and principles.

—Sandra Krebs Hirsch[12]

Hallmarks of the INTJ include independence of thought and a desire for efficiency. They work best when given autonomy and creative freedom. They harbor an innate desire to express themselves by conceptualizing their own intellectual designs. They have a talent for analyzing and formulating complex theories. INTJs are generally well-suited for occupations within academia, research, consulting, management, science, engineering, and law. They are often acutely aware of their own knowledge and abilities—as well as their limitations and what they don't know (a quality that tends to distinguish them from INTPs). INTJs thus develop a strong confidence in their ability and talents, making them natural leaders.

In forming relationships, INTJs tend to seek out others with similar character traits and ideologies. Agreement on theoretical concepts is an important aspect of their relationships. By nature INTJs can be demanding in their expectations, and approach relationships in a rational manner. As a result, INTJs may not always respond to a spontaneous infatuation but wait for a mate who better fits their set criteria. They tend to be stable, reliable, and dedicated. Harmony in relationships and home life tends to be extremely important to them. They generally withhold strong emotion and do not like to waste time with what they consider irrational social rituals. This may cause non-INTJs to perceive them as distant and reserved; nevertheless, INTJs are usually very loyal partners who are prepared to commit substantial energy and time into a relationship to make it work.

As mates, INTJs want harmony and order in the home and in relationships. The most independent of all types,[13] INTJs trust their intuition when choosing friends and mates—even in spite of contradictory evidence or pressure from others. The emotions of an INTJ are hard to read, and neither male nor female INTJs are apt to express emotional reactions. At times, INTJs seem cold, reserved, and unresponsive, while in fact they are almost hypersensitive to signals of rejection from those they care for. In social situations, INTJs may also be unresponsive and may neglect small rituals designed to put others at ease. For example, INTJs may communicate that idle dialogue such as small talk is a waste of time. This may create the impression that the INTJ is in a hurry—an impression that is not always intended. In their interpersonal relationships, INTJs are usually better in a working situation than in a recreational situation.

 

 

O INTJ é o equivalente ao Mastermind de Kersey

 

Masterminds are introspective, logical, rational, pragmatic, clear-headed, directive, and attentive. As strategists, they are better than any other type at brainstorming approaches to situations. Masterminds are capable but not eager leaders, stepping forward only when it becomes obvious to them that they are the best for the job. Strong-willed and very self-assured, they may make this decision quickly, as they tend to make all decisions. But though they are decisive, they are open to new evidence and new ideas, flexible in their planning to accommodate changing situations. They tend to excel at judging the usefulness of ideas and will apply whatever seems most efficient to them in accomplishing their clearly envisioned goals. To Masterminds, what matters is getting it done—but also learning the principles of how to get it done efficiently and well, that is, at a professional level of quality. However, they may not give much thought to the social cost of getting there, "focusing so tightly on their own pursuits [that] they can ignore the points of view and wishes of others."[1]:200

Masterminds are highly pragmatic, and they will put forth a great deal of time and effort to implement effective ideas. They are driven to solve complex problems and to create organized, decided, and executed solutions. Masterminds tend to make positive statements instead of negative ones, focusing on how to make the organization more efficient in the future rather than dwelling on past mistakes.

Masterminds are also highly theoretical, and one of the more open-minded of the 16 role variants. Before Masterminds adopt a theoretical notion, they insist on researching all the available data and checking the idea against reality. Masterminds are suspicious of theories based on poor research and will discard ideas that cannot be effectively implemented.

As leaders, Masterminds are skilled in contingency planning and entailment organizing, which are directive activities that tell the planner what activities to do and in what order to do them. Once in a position of power, Masterminds are known for their efficiency and willingness to adopt useful ideas.

 

 

Por acaso acho que me explica bastante bem, tirando um ou outro ponto, nomeadamente o grande gosto por não fazer um cú da vida :P

 

Esta é uma das frases que melhor me identifica. O ser humano é um produto da natureza, da conjunção de todas as leis da física, mas ao mesmo tempo a sua psique, nas formas mais variadas, é um autêntico caos, não aparenta ter uma organização lógica das ideias e pensamentos, é como se o que as pessoas efectivamente gostam/aceitam/defendem fosse apenas um produto do acaso e não de um pensamento e/ou critérios logico-pragmáticos...

 

INTJs really want people to make sense.

Mas quem e que gosta de fazer um cú da vida xD  Onde fizeram os testes já agora?

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

@@Aragao Isso das doenças não podia concordar mais, eu só sofro de ansiedade e insónias senão já tinha desistido da minha psiquiatra. Podes fazer muitos testes assim na net que te dão um resultado menos preciso (porque são automáticos) de graça, mas podes também fazer como eu e comprar um teste por 85 dolares avaliado por um profissional, eu dou te o link se quiseres dão te certificado e tudo e eu fi-lo porque fica bem no meu curriculo.

 

@hikigaya_haru  Eu cá acho que não fazer nada, nada tem a ver com ser INTJ, já ser um filho da mãe manipulativo isso sim tem. :D

1 membro gostou disto!

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

@@Zephirus e @@hikigaya_haru  digam me algo / analisem 

 

Seu tipo de personalidade: INTP (Turbulenta).

Pontos fortes de características individuais: Mental - Introvertido (69%),Energia - Intuitivo (23%), Natureza - Racional (14%), Táticas - Perceptivo (51%), Identidade - Turbulenta (17%).

Quão certos são estes testes?

Editado por Aragao

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

Circa 75% de certeza.

 

Vai ao google, escreve INTP, lê e depois mete aqui o que achaste ;)

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

Até que enfim um tópico que se aproveite, passado tanto tempo.

Se queres que te diga, tenho procurado durante bué tempo se haveria algum nome para o tipo de pessoa que sou, e acho que isso do transtorno esquizóide de personalidade encaixa perfeitamente na minha pessoa.

Quanto ao teste de personalidade, bastante interessante. Os testes online são assim tão credíveis como o de um "profissional"?

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

Até que enfim um tópico que se aproveite, passado tanto tempo.

Se queres que te diga, tenho procurado durante bué tempo se haveria algum nome para o tipo de pessoa que sou, e acho que isso do transtorno esquizóide de personalidade encaixa perfeitamente na minha pessoa.

Quanto ao teste de personalidade, bastante interessante. Os testes online são assim tão credíveis como o de um "profissional"?

 

 

Duvido sériamente. Mas sempre dá alguma insight. E no teu caso não seria transtorno esquizitóide em vez de esquizóide? :P

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais
E no teu caso não seria transtorno esquizitóide em vez de esquizóide?

Pá, continua a ser o outro, mas podes acrescentar o esquizitóide à equação. 

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

Acho que o teste acertou em cheio , eu que ate nem sou muito de acreditar nestas coisas mas descreve me perfeitamente o INTP que eu sou

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais
ISTJ
Introvert(78%)  Sensing(1%)  Thinking(62%)  Judging(67%)
  • You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (78%)
  • You have marginal or no preference of Sensing over Intuition (1%)
  • You have distinct preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%)
  • You have distinct preference of Judging over Perceiving (67%)

ISTJs are often called inspectors. They have a keen sense of right and wrong, especially in their area of interest and/or responsibility. They are noted for devotion to duty. Punctuality is a watchword of the ISTJ. The secretary, clerk, or business(wo)man by whom others set their clocks is likely to be an ISTJ.

As do other Introverted Thinkers, ISTJs often give the initial impression of being aloof and perhaps somewhat cold. Effusive expression of emotional warmth is not something that ISTJs do without considerable energy loss.

ISTJs are most at home with "just the facts, Ma'am." They seem to perform at highest efficiency when employing a step-by-step approach. Once a new procedure has proven itself (i.e., has been shown "to work,") the ISTJ can be depended upon to carry it through, even at the expense of their own health.

ISTJs are easily frustrated by the inconsistencies of others, especially when the second parties don't keep their commitments. But they usually keep their feelings to themselves unless they are asked. And when asked, they don't mince words. Truth wins out over tact. The grim determination of the ISTJ vindicates itself in officiation of sports events, judiciary functions, or an other situation which requires making tough calls and sticking to them.

Their SJ orientation draws the ISTJ into the service of established institutions. Home, social clubs, government, schools, the military, churches -- these are the bastions of the SJ. "We've always done it this way" is often reason enough for many ISTJs. Threats to time-honored traditions or established organizations (e.g., a "run" on the bank) are the undoing of SJs, and are to be fought at all costs.

(ISTJ stands for Introvert, Sensing, Thinking, Judging and represents individual's preferences in four dimensions characterising personality type, according to Jung's and Briggs Myers' theories of personality type.)

Your Type Preferences

Introvert(78%) Sensing(1%) Thinking(62%) Judging(67%)

Because you appear to have marginal or no (1%) preference of Sensing over Intuition, characteristics of more than one personality type may apply to you:
ISTJ and INTJ.

 

 

Tava à espera de ser mais como o Hitler, mas acho que sou demasiado introvertido.

Editado por Sharinflan

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

@@Sharinflan uma das vantagens de ser diagnosticado com esta doença, é se Portugal entrar numa guerra eu posso dizer que não sou mentalmente capaz de ser soldado e isso por si é uma mais valia. XD Yay para não se ser soldado à força.

1 membro gostou disto!

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

@@Sharinflan uma das vantagens de ser diagnosticado com esta doença, é se Portugal entrar numa guerra eu posso dizer que não sou mentalmente capaz de ser soldado e isso por si é uma mais valia. XD Yay para não se ser soldado à força.

Vais virar tactical ! nao tens outro remedio !

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

@@Sharinflan uma das vantagens de ser diagnosticado com esta doença, é se Portugal entrar numa guerra eu posso dizer que não sou mentalmente capaz de ser soldado e isso por si é uma mais valia. XD Yay para não se ser soldado à força.

Agora que dizes isso... é que eu tou na Inglaterra, e aqui eles gostam muito de pôr as pessoas com esse tipo de problemas em casa a receber money sem fazer nada.

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

...depois vao ao dsm ou ao cdi e espero que concluam que estão a dizer disparates... ou nao!

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

A unica questão que me resta é " Existe algum teste que prove que és um Otaku?"  ou só pelo simples fato de ver animes chega para ser? Ou podemos definir varias classes de Otakus/neets? Ou uma espécie de hierarquia ?

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais

@ Eu sei o que estou a dizer porque em ambos os casos fui visto por um profissional. XD @@Sharinflan se a homossexualidade fosse ainda considerada uma doença hoje em dia, também eles recebiam XD



A unica questão que me resta é " Existe algum teste que prove que és um Otaku?"  ou só pelo simples fato de ver animes chega para ser? Ou podemos definir varias classes de Otakus/neets? Ou uma espécie de hierarquia ?

Era fixe que houvesse um teste oficial, e sim há varias classes de otakus, há os cosplayers, os trolls, os otakus de plantão (como eu que quase não vou a inventos), os weeaboos, os wapanese, e há os otakings

Partilhar esta mensagem


Link para a mensagem
Partilhar nas redes sociais